9/11 TV Hoax
Quote from PortalFan77 on April 19, 2008, 10:13 amhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6pGD6U004fA
ALSO CHECK OUT THE LIST OF OTHER ACCOUNTS
AND DISCUSS
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6pGD6U004fA
ALSO CHECK OUT THE LIST OF OTHER ACCOUNTS
AND DISCUSS
Quote from NocturnalGhost on April 19, 2008, 1:56 pmTo say that 9/11 was orchestrated by factions within the US Government is one thing. I personally think that it is just as plausible as the "official version" of events.
However, to say that it was all faked with chromakeying is, in my opinion, ridiculous. There were too many eyewitnesses, and independently filmed clips from camcorders, cellphones etc. to give this "theory" any weight.
Interesting technique though. I'm sure it has been used in the past in similar ways to what is suggested here. Just not in the case of 9/11. It's videos like this that damage the credibility of more legitimate "truth seeking" videos.
Then again, maybe that's the idea.
To say that 9/11 was orchestrated by factions within the US Government is one thing. I personally think that it is just as plausible as the "official version" of events.
However, to say that it was all faked with chromakeying is, in my opinion, ridiculous. There were too many eyewitnesses, and independently filmed clips from camcorders, cellphones etc. to give this "theory" any weight.
Interesting technique though. I'm sure it has been used in the past in similar ways to what is suggested here. Just not in the case of 9/11. It's videos like this that damage the credibility of more legitimate "truth seeking" videos.
Then again, maybe that's the idea.
Quote from PortalFan77 on April 19, 2008, 2:08 pmNocturnalGhost wrote:To say that 9/11 was orchestrated by factions within the US Government is one thing. I personally think that it is just as plausible as the "official version" of events.However, to say that it was all faked with chromakeying is, in my opinion, ridiculous. There were too many eyewitnesses, and independently filmed clips from camcorders, cellphones etc. to give this "theory" any weight.
Interesting technique though. I'm sure it has been used in the past in similar ways to what is suggested here. Just not in the case of 9/11. It's videos like this that damage the credibility of more legitimate "truth seeking" videos.
Then again, maybe that's the idea.
Blows your mind thinking about it doesnt it.
However, to say that it was all faked with chromakeying is, in my opinion, ridiculous. There were too many eyewitnesses, and independently filmed clips from camcorders, cellphones etc. to give this "theory" any weight.
Interesting technique though. I'm sure it has been used in the past in similar ways to what is suggested here. Just not in the case of 9/11. It's videos like this that damage the credibility of more legitimate "truth seeking" videos.
Then again, maybe that's the idea.
Blows your mind thinking about it doesnt it.
Quote from ecco on April 19, 2008, 2:34 pmI live across the bridge in New Jersey and can actually see the Empire State building from my upstairs window; and if I drive for about 5 mins towards some higher ground / cliffside, I used to be able to see the twin towers. These are amazing structures quite large and tall-- they cover an entire city block radius each- and can be seen from miles and I do mean miiilllles away... what I'm tryin' to say is-- although such an insane event may seem like it couldn't have been real or fabrication of the government because it looks like something out of a movie-- I assure you it is real; thousands upon thousands of people clearly for miles and miles away saw the explosions and smoke coming from the buildings and rising high above the sky; in fact the damage was so intense that a huge cloud of gray smoke covered that area for a better part of a day or two... now I can't understand the reasoning of this video clip claiming it was all camera tricks and special effects - but it amazes me how stupid they think people are-- and how inconsiderate to the families of those that were lost-- because take a drive up to Rockerfeller center any day and you'll see there are two huuuuge building structures missing and you'll see what's left-- heck you'll notice the cityscape along the coastline lacking it's traditional twin towers a long time before you even come near NYC let alone the street where the events took place.
With that said; if you want to look more into the tragedy of this event; search for some of the conspiracy video clips particularly the ones that show slowmo video of the explosions and impacts- and you'll begin to understand there def was more to this event than two planes being hijacked... this seemed like a planned event to demolish the towers via explosives-- under the umbrella of terrorism - where evidence leads to the the gain of certain corporations; the start of a pointless war; and so on
There is proof that these structures could not have collapsed the way they did without a planned explosive demolition-- they were even designed to withstand the heat from the gas -- specially considering the gas from the planes burnt out in the initial explosion so the fire and heat could not have spread in the manner that they claim-- there are video interviews of architects; firemen; business men; countless civilian eye witnesses; and even the maintenance people that were inside the towers at the time giving evidence that frankly scares me when I think about how our government could have let this happen.
PS: There was a third building that wasn't even hit by a plane! Which fell exactly the same way the towers fell; pretty much how a planned building demolition takes place... this third building was part of the plaza center; and involved in the corporations that gained millions and millions from this tragedy judging from what some of the evidence discloses...
Just go on youtube and type twin tower conspiracy and see how many diff videos show up-- it's crazy.
I live across the bridge in New Jersey and can actually see the Empire State building from my upstairs window; and if I drive for about 5 mins towards some higher ground / cliffside, I used to be able to see the twin towers. These are amazing structures quite large and tall-- they cover an entire city block radius each- and can be seen from miles and I do mean miiilllles away... what I'm tryin' to say is-- although such an insane event may seem like it couldn't have been real or fabrication of the government because it looks like something out of a movie-- I assure you it is real; thousands upon thousands of people clearly for miles and miles away saw the explosions and smoke coming from the buildings and rising high above the sky; in fact the damage was so intense that a huge cloud of gray smoke covered that area for a better part of a day or two... now I can't understand the reasoning of this video clip claiming it was all camera tricks and special effects - but it amazes me how stupid they think people are-- and how inconsiderate to the families of those that were lost-- because take a drive up to Rockerfeller center any day and you'll see there are two huuuuge building structures missing and you'll see what's left-- heck you'll notice the cityscape along the coastline lacking it's traditional twin towers a long time before you even come near NYC let alone the street where the events took place.
With that said; if you want to look more into the tragedy of this event; search for some of the conspiracy video clips particularly the ones that show slowmo video of the explosions and impacts- and you'll begin to understand there def was more to this event than two planes being hijacked... this seemed like a planned event to demolish the towers via explosives-- under the umbrella of terrorism - where evidence leads to the the gain of certain corporations; the start of a pointless war; and so on
There is proof that these structures could not have collapsed the way they did without a planned explosive demolition-- they were even designed to withstand the heat from the gas -- specially considering the gas from the planes burnt out in the initial explosion so the fire and heat could not have spread in the manner that they claim-- there are video interviews of architects; firemen; business men; countless civilian eye witnesses; and even the maintenance people that were inside the towers at the time giving evidence that frankly scares me when I think about how our government could have let this happen.
PS: There was a third building that wasn't even hit by a plane! Which fell exactly the same way the towers fell; pretty much how a planned building demolition takes place... this third building was part of the plaza center; and involved in the corporations that gained millions and millions from this tragedy judging from what some of the evidence discloses...
Just go on youtube and type twin tower conspiracy and see how many diff videos show up-- it's crazy.
Quote from Hober on April 19, 2008, 2:56 pmI'm locking this thread and anyone who disagrees may PM me personally. This is not the place for this sort of political discussion, and in truth it will only alienate some among us.
I'm doing this because I was very close to fisking your entire post, Ecco. But most of its false statements are exposed by Popular Mechanics here. But this is not the place for such things, and I have no stomach to argue this.
I'm locking this thread and anyone who disagrees may PM me personally. This is not the place for this sort of political discussion, and in truth it will only alienate some among us.
I'm doing this because I was very close to fisking your entire post, Ecco. But most of its false statements are exposed by Popular Mechanics here. But this is not the place for such things, and I have no stomach to argue this.