Dynamic Lighting in Source
Quote from Remmiz on August 14, 2008, 6:34 pmWhy is everyone so obsessed with "perfect" shadows? Last time I checked, unless you are 1-2ft away from the surface which the show is projected it gets pretty blurry. No way something as small as a gun can project a perfect outline shadow on a wall 30ft away. And isn't this already possible via env projectedtexture? (with code changes to allow more than one per map obviously)
Why is everyone so obsessed with "perfect" shadows? Last time I checked, unless you are 1-2ft away from the surface which the show is projected it gets pretty blurry. No way something as small as a gun can project a perfect outline shadow on a wall 30ft away. And isn't this already possible via env projectedtexture? (with code changes to allow more than one per map obviously)
Quote from msleeper on August 14, 2008, 10:28 pmRemmiz wrote:And isn't this already possible via env projectedtexture? (with code changes to allow more than one per map obviously)That's exactly what this is. MrTwo is calling it lighting to fool people.
That's exactly what this is. MrTwo is calling it lighting to fool people.
Please do not Private Message me for assistance. Post a thread if you have questions or concerns.
If you need to contact the staff privately, contact the Global Moderators via Discord.
Quote from rellikpd on August 15, 2008, 5:23 amlook, the man is literally MADE from two video cards... if anyone would know about video/light processing it would be him.
how many video cards are you made of? NONE thats right. so btfo
look, the man is literally MADE from two video cards... if anyone would know about video/light processing it would be him.
how many video cards are you made of? NONE thats right. so btfo
Quote from MrTwoVideoCards on August 15, 2008, 6:15 amCompared to light_dynamic this is WAY better.
Compared to light_dynamic this is WAY better.
Quote from ultradude25 on August 15, 2008, 2:37 pmPortalFan77 wrote:Um what? where did this come from, everyone knows she is a girl but um I wasnt even talking about chell let alone did I mention her...The sound clip said, "Do not place genitals in the operational end of The Device" and since Chell is the one wielding The Device, it is impossible.
The sound clip said, "Do not place genitals in the operational end of The Device" and since Chell is the one wielding The Device, it is impossible.
Quote from Reverend Protocol on August 18, 2008, 4:53 amultradude25 wrote:The sound clip said, "Do not place genitals in the operational end of The Device" and since Chell is the one wielding The Device, it is impossible.Yes, but the sound clips in the single player obviously point to much of what GLaDOS says as being canned responses to a certain extent. The subject holding it could be male, at some point.
Yes, but the sound clips in the single player obviously point to much of what GLaDOS says as being canned responses to a certain extent. The subject holding it could be male, at some point.
Quote from WackoMcGoose on August 18, 2008, 2:13 pmReverend Protocol wrote:Yes, but the sound clips in the single player obviously point to much of what GLaDOS says as being canned responses to a certain extent. The subject holding it could be male, at some point.Thank you, Captain Obvious. Everyone that played the original Testchamber 16 (first appearance of the Turrets) knows that most, if not all, of GLaDOS' responses are preset. As soon as your brain rationalizes the broken logic between "Well done, android." and the fact that Chell is human, it becomes very obvious.
The bts parts between Testchamber 19 and the GLaDOS Room couldn't have been canned responses, because apparently, this was the first time that someone had escaped.
Thank you, Captain Obvious. Everyone that played the original Testchamber 16 (first appearance of the Turrets) knows that most, if not all, of GLaDOS' responses are preset. As soon as your brain rationalizes the broken logic between "Well done, android." and the fact that Chell is human, it becomes very obvious.
The bts parts between Testchamber 19 and the GLaDOS Room couldn't have been canned responses, because apparently, this was the first time that someone had escaped.
*fifty cakes fall out*
Time out for a second. That wasn't supposed to happen.
Quote from Ricotez on August 18, 2008, 3:46 pmWackoMcGoose wrote:The bts parts between Testchamber 19 and the GLaDOS Room couldn't have been canned responses, because apparently, this was the first time that someone had escaped.[spoiler]Ask yourself this: if that is the case, then who scribbled all those clues on the walls past Testchamber 19?
I don't think Chell is the first to escape. But she is the first to get that far; all the way to GLaDOS, and even killing her.[/spoiler]
"Duct Tape is the answer."
Quote from Sythes on August 18, 2008, 4:01 pmRicotez wrote:[spoiler]Ask yourself this: if that is the case, then who scribbled all those clues on the walls past Testchamber 19?I don't think Chell is the first to escape. But she is the first to get that far; all the way to GLaDOS, and even killing her.[/spoiler]
Didn't you hear the song? She's Still Alive.
Didn't you hear the song? She's Still Alive.
Quote from Ricotez on August 18, 2008, 4:17 pm[spoiler]Her AI is still alive. Her physical form, however, is destroyed, sucked through the malfunctioning portal that transported the GLaDOS hull and you outside of the facility. After all, you "Tore [GLaDOS] to pieces. And threw every piece into a fire."[/spoiler]
"Duct Tape is the answer."