Reviving the Review Forum
I had a sense that there might be some people in the community of this mind, but I never could find a way to say this without sounding arrogant. But, here goes: I'd like to think I, too, am a decent writer, and I'm also a recreational asshole, which makes me a perfect candidate for being an editor. (Okay, that came out with self-deprecation instead of arrogance. Hmm.)
Either way, if you'd like some editing or help polishing a review, I'd like to think I could help you out. If you'd like to see the level of polish I put on my own stuff, check out some posts at my blog.
off topic: that shit sir, was great
on topic: review = re view = to view again, shouldn't they instead be called "previews" cuz. to read a "review" means i should be (in a sense) seeing it again, unless of coarse you are reading a review of a map you already played. but what would be the point of that? to see what some pompus asshole*(1) thinks about a map you already played? i don't know
anyway that was really off topic too.
i guess i'm gunna have to start trying to write some shit. or get off this post.
*1: [joke]
lol: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Review
Sometimes a word means more than the sum of its parts.
yeah i was pretty much rambling and looking for a way to fuck with you.