The Off-Topic Thread
Quote from shad0w440 on August 15, 2012, 12:38 amSO many good thing happened to me today
I finished my machinima, the one that was sitting incomplete on my hard drive for a year
I got my replacement headphones in the mail (under warranty)
And my Atlas edition Portal Gun came aswell.
SO many good thing happened to me today
I finished my machinima, the one that was sitting incomplete on my hard drive for a year
I got my replacement headphones in the mail (under warranty )
And my Atlas edition Portal Gun came aswell.
Quote from Jomonay on August 23, 2012, 5:57 pmJust a reminder that we have created cars that can run on light. Pretty fucking incredible.
Just a reminder that we have created cars that can run on light. Pretty fucking incredible.
http://www.soundcloud.com/jomonay
"Anything that you do, just be THE best at it" - Kanye West

Quote from ChickenMobile on August 23, 2012, 10:09 pmJomonay wrote:Just a reminder that we have created cars that can run on light. Pretty fucking incredible.I can see all these cars being crushed because the oil companies wouldn't get any profit off them. Perhaps these cars would break down in about a month of using it so then they would have to be constantly repaired.
The world is about consumerism and not being green.
I can see all these cars being crushed because the oil companies wouldn't get any profit off them. Perhaps these cars would break down in about a month of using it so then they would have to be constantly repaired.
The world is about consumerism and not being green.
Quote from MasterLagger on August 23, 2012, 10:22 pmChickenMobile wrote:Jomonay wrote:Just a reminder that we have created cars that can run on light. Pretty fucking incredible.I can see all these cars being crushed because the oil companies wouldn't get any profit off them. Perhaps these cars would break down in about a month of using it so then they would have to be constantly repaired.
And I can see oil companies being easily flammable. *insert evil laugh*
I like the fact that cars can run on sunlight. But whiners are going to whine unless you give them what they want or do something to shut them up.
I can see all these cars being crushed because the oil companies wouldn't get any profit off them. Perhaps these cars would break down in about a month of using it so then they would have to be constantly repaired.
And I can see oil companies being easily flammable. *insert evil laugh*
I like the fact that cars can run on sunlight. But whiners are going to whine unless you give them what they want or do something to shut them up.
My Work
[spoiler]Maps:
Revenge of the Angry Turrets
Capture the Cube [Co-op]
Capture the Cube 2 [Co-op]
TPWEGTH Sample Map
Aperture Aquatic Testing Center
Aperture Aquatic Testing Center 2
Aperture Time Testing Center
ML's Halloween Trick - 1000 downloads!
ML's Halloween Treat
ML's Combination - 1000 downloads!
ML's Jailbreak Labyrinth
ML's Tricky Teamwork [Co-op]
WIP:
"Capture the Cube 3"
Workshop Maps Link: http://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198008890579/myworkshopfiles/[/spoiler]
Quote from FourthReaper on August 24, 2012, 7:49 amChickenMobile wrote:Jomonay wrote:Just a reminder that we have created cars that can run on light. Pretty fucking incredible.I can see all these cars being crushed because the oil companies wouldn't get any profit off them. Perhaps these cars would break down in about a month of using it so then they would have to be constantly repaired.
Ah well, most of the (smaller) oil companies will not be profitable anymore anyway in about 20-30 years, with oil lasting 40. After that these 'green' cars and everything similar will be the only way to go, really. That and nuclear power, which is also a good power source. The only problem then is that companies are going to claim to 'own' solar power and shit in the form of taxes.
And these green technologies will turn profitable at some point, so no real need to worry to much about durability now.
I can see all these cars being crushed because the oil companies wouldn't get any profit off them. Perhaps these cars would break down in about a month of using it so then they would have to be constantly repaired.
Ah well, most of the (smaller) oil companies will not be profitable anymore anyway in about 20-30 years, with oil lasting 40. After that these 'green' cars and everything similar will be the only way to go, really. That and nuclear power, which is also a good power source. The only problem then is that companies are going to claim to 'own' solar power and shit in the form of taxes.
And these green technologies will turn profitable at some point, so no real need to worry to much about durability now.
Quote from Brainstone on August 28, 2012, 7:05 pmFourthReaper wrote:That and nuclear power, which is also a good power source.I don't really agree. The Plutonium 239 used in nuclear power plants is incredibly toxic and has a half-value period of 24.000 years. I don't believe that we are able to "hide" dangerous nuclear waste over hundred thousands of years, considering ancient egypt was 4000 years, the last ice-age 8000 years ago. The costs for disposal of nuclear waste though are paid by the state (all people together) and not by those who actually buy the electricity. If external costs in the electricity branch were internalized, nuclear power would become significally more expensive.
It is so human to first create problems, afterwards delay them to the future or try to forget about them and then continue one's stupid behaviour only out of comfort.
I don't really agree. The Plutonium 239 used in nuclear power plants is incredibly toxic and has a half-value period of 24.000 years. I don't believe that we are able to "hide" dangerous nuclear waste over hundred thousands of years, considering ancient egypt was 4000 years, the last ice-age 8000 years ago. The costs for disposal of nuclear waste though are paid by the state (all people together) and not by those who actually buy the electricity. If external costs in the electricity branch were internalized, nuclear power would become significally more expensive.
It is so human to first create problems, afterwards delay them to the future or try to forget about them and then continue one's stupid behaviour only out of comfort.
Quote from Jomonay on August 28, 2012, 8:09 pmBrainstone wrote:The Plutonium 239 used in nuclear power plants is incredibly toxic and has a half-value period of 24.000 years. I don't believe that we are able to "hide" dangerous nuclear waste over hundred thousands of yearsThat didn't make sense to me
Brainstone wrote:It is so human to first create problems, afterwards delay them to the future or try to forget about them and then continue one's stupid behaviour only out of comfort.Did Che Guevara teach you that?
That didn't make sense to me
Did Che Guevara teach you that?
http://www.soundcloud.com/jomonay
"Anything that you do, just be THE best at it" - Kanye West
Quote from NeXT-Gen_P0rtal on August 28, 2012, 10:30 pmBrainstone wrote:It is so human to first create problems, afterwards delay them to the future or try to forget about them and then continue one's stupid behaviour only out of comfort.You talk as if you weren't one yourself...
You talk as if you weren't one yourself...
Check out my Portal 2 Workshop! http://steamcommunity.com/id/nextgenp0r ... shopfiles/
"Never give up, never surrender. P0rtal forever." - NeXTGenP0rtaler.
Join my robot-related Steam group! http://steamcommunity.com/groups/groupofrobots
Quote from FourthReaper on August 29, 2012, 6:11 amBrainstone wrote:FourthReaper wrote:That and nuclear power, which is also a good power source.I don't really agree. The Plutonium 239 used in nuclear power plants is incredibly toxic and has a half-value period of 24.000 years. I don't believe that we are able to "hide" dangerous nuclear waste over hundred thousands of years
I understand your concerns with nuclear waste, yet just like oil there's no gain in just not using these power sources, and while uranium and other fueling materials do collapse into nuclear waste it does harbor a lot of energy that we can either utilize or leave. Might as well try to preserve oil a little longer and use nuclear power. Only problem is that companies prefer cheap disposal of nuclear waste over good disposal, even though in the end it would still be more profitable than oil.
How 'bout nuclear fusion, then? First awareness for nuclear power needs to be raised so that more research can be done into that. After that it's a pretty reliable and sustainable power source. It's what the sun does.
PS: I realize I'm making the off-topic thread a lot less funny than it should be, so have at it whisecrackers.
I don't really agree. The Plutonium 239 used in nuclear power plants is incredibly toxic and has a half-value period of 24.000 years. I don't believe that we are able to "hide" dangerous nuclear waste over hundred thousands of years
I understand your concerns with nuclear waste, yet just like oil there's no gain in just not using these power sources, and while uranium and other fueling materials do collapse into nuclear waste it does harbor a lot of energy that we can either utilize or leave. Might as well try to preserve oil a little longer and use nuclear power. Only problem is that companies prefer cheap disposal of nuclear waste over good disposal, even though in the end it would still be more profitable than oil.
How 'bout nuclear fusion, then? First awareness for nuclear power needs to be raised so that more research can be done into that. After that it's a pretty reliable and sustainable power source. It's what the sun does.
PS: I realize I'm making the off-topic thread a lot less funny than it should be, so have at it whisecrackers.
Quote from Brainstone on August 29, 2012, 7:11 am
I need to clarify some things here. First of all, I'm not a communist. I use that profile picture, because this rebellious turret will play an important rule in my upcoming mod, okay? I've always been a supporter of social market economy.
@jomonay: If you have 1kg Plutonium 239 and store it 8 x 24.000 years, ~ 3, 9 gram will be left, what is still by far enough to kill.
If you want an objective opinion about high-level waste management take a look at this wikipedia article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-level_radioactive_waste_management
I spoke about delaying problems. Of course I myself am very familiar with delaying problems, I do it all the time. For example when I need to write a housework I usually wait to the last day. (this is not smart by me) The problem we are right now talking about though, is the problem that nobody knows how to get rid of this nuclear waste. That is of great importance and should not be delayed. What people do, is to say: "Someone will some when in the future solve this problem we created for him, probably using bigger amounts of energy and/or money than we got out of it, but right now, we are having profit."
This is by no means a smart behaviour.Oh, and I agree with FourthReaper, that nuclear fusion is an interesting aproach.
I need to clarify some things here. First of all, I'm not a communist. I use that profile picture, because this rebellious turret will play an important rule in my upcoming mod, okay? I've always been a supporter of social market economy.
@jomonay: If you have 1kg Plutonium 239 and store it 8 x 24.000 years, ~ 3, 9 gram will be left, what is still by far enough to kill.
If you want an objective opinion about high-level waste management take a look at this wikipedia article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-level_radioactive_waste_management
I spoke about delaying problems. Of course I myself am very familiar with delaying problems, I do it all the time. For example when I need to write a housework I usually wait to the last day. (this is not smart by me) The problem we are right now talking about though, is the problem that nobody knows how to get rid of this nuclear waste. That is of great importance and should not be delayed. What people do, is to say: "Someone will some when in the future solve this problem we created for him, probably using bigger amounts of energy and/or money than we got out of it, but right now, we are having profit."
This is by no means a smart behaviour.
Oh, and I agree with FourthReaper, that nuclear fusion is an interesting aproach.