Speculation with portals

Avatar
E1025
104 Posts
Posted Feb 26, 2008
Replied 2 hours later
You could twist the pole, and move the pole on the x and y axis but you couldn't rotate it at an angle. Also, after re-thinking about it, the other "half" wouldn't rotate to the other direction.
Advertisement
Registered users don't see ads! Register now!
Avatar
rellikpd
1,053 Posts
Posted Feb 26, 2008
Replied 6 hours later

E1025 wrote:
You could twist the pole, and move the pole on the x and y axis but you couldn't rotate it at an angle. Also, after re-thinking about it, the other "half" wouldn't rotate to the other direction.

twisting the pole wouldn't do jack. but if you placed the bottom portal at a slightly off angle you would start to spin; like. you ever try to do the terminal velocity setup... and have the bottom (or top for that matter) slightly askew? man you start spinning . the more askew the faster you start spinning

Avatar
sssummer
69 Posts
Posted Mar 10, 2008
Replied 13 days later
bump, great thread, cant let this die
Avatar
iamafractal
272 Posts
Posted Mar 10, 2008
Replied 2 hours later
if you're gonna bump a thread, at least have something valuable to say, like why doesn't somebody try to program this situation so we can see how it plays out.
Avatar
Ricotez
738 Posts
Posted Mar 11, 2008
Replied 17 hours later
Well, the problem with that would be that only prop_physics can cross portals, not prop_dynamics. Then again, it would be a nice idea... maybe you'd have to parent the pole (prop_physics) to itself.
Avatar
NykO18
183 Posts
Posted Mar 11, 2008
Replied 3 hours later

Ricotez wrote:
maybe you'd have to parent the pole (prop_physics) to itself.

... and make the game crash ^^

Avatar
E1025
104 Posts
Posted Mar 11, 2008
Replied 24 minutes later
Here's another one. What would happen if you connected a 0 in a modified version of portal to a 0 in real life?
Avatar
Ricotez
738 Posts
Posted Mar 11, 2008
Replied 26 minutes later
you would end up inside your computer case
Avatar
Hober
1,180 Posts
Posted Mar 11, 2008
Replied 17 minutes later

E1025 wrote:
Here's another one. What would happen if you connected a 0 in a modified version of portal to a 0 in real life?

Tron.

Next!

Avatar
Cooper
129 Posts
Posted Mar 28, 2008
Replied 17 days later
Another idea in respect to the 2 blue portals leading to 1 red portal. What would happen if two people went into the blue portals at the same time?
Avatar
Ricotez
738 Posts
Posted Mar 29, 2008
Replied 9 hours later
Probably this:

Avatar
rellikpd
1,053 Posts
Posted Mar 29, 2008
Replied 3 hours later

Ricotez wrote:
Probably this:

HITCHHIKERS FTMFW!

Avatar
NykO18
183 Posts
Posted Mar 29, 2008
Replied 3 hours later
Splash ?
Avatar
rellikpd
1,053 Posts
Posted Mar 29, 2008
Replied 6 minutes later

NykO18 wrote:
Splash ?

Best Movie Ever ?

Avatar
Ricotez
738 Posts
Posted Mar 29, 2008
Replied 12 minutes later
So long, and thanks for the fish.
Avatar
Cooper
129 Posts
Posted Mar 30, 2008
Replied 14 hours later
Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy FTW!
Avatar
Ricotez
738 Posts
Posted Mar 30, 2008
Replied 5 hours later
All nice and everything, but we're getting off-topic here. Back to portal speculation!
Avatar
youme
937 Posts
Posted Mar 30, 2008
Replied 8 minutes later
If you were to stand inside the portal, with your feet on the bottom of the portal itself, surely the wall you are standing on is infinitesimally small and if the gravity is down on both sides surely the downward force would just cut you in half like a highly efective piece of cheese wire?
Essentially rendering portal-tunneling useless because as soon as you attempted it you'd be come two rather seperate halves of mush
Avatar
rellikpd
1,053 Posts
Posted Mar 30, 2008
Replied 1 hour later

youme wrote:
If you were to stand inside the portal, with your feet on the bottom of the portal itself, surely the wall you are standing on is infinitesimally small and if the gravity is down on both sides surely the downward force would just cut you in half like a highly efective piece of cheese wire?
Essentially rendering portal-tunneling useless because as soon as you attempted it you'd be come two rather seperate halves of mush

interesting point. when they first came out with linoleum its strength was calculated to be several hundred pounds per square inch (can't remember the actual strength) and it was considered strong. but they noticed that there were small divots appearing in them, and people were like "WTF?".... short answer, High-Heels.... cuz when you put ALOT of weight on a SMALL surface... damage happens.... try putting 220lbs (me) on an infinitesimally small surface... CHEESED! but.. maybe... her heel springs help? i know. it really wouldn't matter WHAT you put there. anyweight or matterial at that small of a surface area would be sliced. but i just want to try to make up a bullshit excuse to make portal make sense.

Advertisement
Registered users don't see ads! Register now!
Avatar
youme
937 Posts
Posted Mar 30, 2008
Replied 36 minutes later
well I did kinda already mention this point when we were discussing tunneling, but I think I decided that standing in a portal would be fine then because you could kinda curl your feet around what would be a thin edge, but not thin enough to cheesewire you.

Perhaps the portal edge has somekind of nuclear repulsion that repells everything regardless of its charge. This might explain the strange fire like effect seen at the edges