theVDude wrote:
<3 PARTY!

In 3002!

again wrote:
i'm gonna party likes it 1399! yeah!

For the 3002, I was just kidding - 3002 is really a Wedding Year, you know, linking the two people by ...

again wrote:
:| i still intend to party as in the year 1399.
gonna usher in the middle ages in style.

I don't intend to party at all. It's just so pointless.

Remmiz wrote:
It took me about 15 minutes to figure out a way to get to this thread.

Not sure how he did it. .

reepblue wrote:
Not sure how he did it. .

When you are in, bookmark the post.

ASBusinessMagnet wrote:
When you are in, bookmark the post.

I click the icon it says "latest post" and it's a link to the thread it's next to the poster of the latest post's name

pestchamber wrote:
I click the icon it says "latest post" and it's a link to the thread it's next to the poster of the latest post's name

I meant going to the thread when you've looked at it and wanna post again after not posting - there is no way you could retrieve that button.

ASBusinessMagnet wrote:
I meant going to the thread when you've looked at it and wanna post again after not posting - there is no way you could retrieve that button.

This is how it looks:

? ## theVDude ### Blah

But now that there's a new page it doesn't matter

pestchamber wrote:
This is how it looks:

? ## theVDude ### Blah

But now that there's a new page it doesn't matter

And now what? shy-shy-shy-shy-shy-shy-shy-shy-t1757-15.html

ASBusinessMagnet wrote:
And now what? shy-shy-shy-shy-shy-shy-shy-shy-t1757-15.html

What the crap.

pestchamber wrote:
What the crap.

I agree. It's annoying.

ASBusinessMagnet wrote:
I agree. It's annoying.

This thread makes no sense :s