Wheatly in space

Avatar
200 Posts
Posted Jul 23, 2012
[url:28rwzqq7]http://www.thinkwithportals.com/blog.php?id=8447&p=1[/url:28rwzqq7]
Advertisement
Registered users don’t see ads! Register now!
Avatar
306 Posts
Posted Jul 23, 2012
Replied 2 hours later
Why isn't it the Space Core? :pbody_facepalm:
Posted Jul 23, 2012
Replied 2 hours later

Sven wrote:
Why isn't it the Space Core? :pbody_facepalm:

They sorta made it look like the space core

Let's just pretend :razz:

Avatar
306 Posts
Posted Jul 23, 2012
Replied 1 hour later

p0rtalplayer wrote:

Sven wrote:
Why isn't it the Space Core? :pbody_facepalm:>

They sorta made it look like the space core

Let's just pretend :razz:

Not good enough! :cry:

Posted Jul 24, 2012
Replied 22 hours later

Sven wrote:

p0rtalplayer wrote:

Sven wrote:
Why isn't it the Space Core? :pbody_facepalm:>>

They sorta made it look like the space core

Let's just pretend :razz:>
Not good enough! :cry:

I thought it WAS the space core! It's even his quote!

WTF VALVe..?!?!?

Posted Jul 24, 2012
Replied 6 minutes later
Valve didn't do it, Grox. It was a NASA employee, Valve fan, and probably now a guy who is unemployed.
Posted Jul 25, 2012
Replied 2 hours later

vanSulli wrote:
Valve didn't do it, Grox. It was a NASA employee, Valve fan, and probably now a guy who is unemployed.

No no, I mean noone said which core it was until VALVe mentioned it (afaik), so IMO it's VALVe's fault for misnoming the core.

Advertisement
Registered users don’t see ads! Register now!
Posted Jul 25, 2012
Replied 11 minutes later
I was assuming that the person at NASA had told Valve something along the lines of "Look, I put Wheatley on a circuit board!" Its possible that the Valve publicity people goofed, too.