Get the Cake/WCC in Portal [No Cheats]

Avatar
Test Subject
162 Posts
Posted Jun 08, 2008

I saw this video on YouTube and I wondered if it was true. If you do it right, you can get the cake and your Weighted Companion Cube and be in the room with all of the GLaDOS cores (The ball things) along with a portal to the outside. Is this true, or did the person just noclip to the different areas and put portals between them and make a fake video? I personally think it's fake.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e5QveX3-1O8

Advertisement
Registered users don't see ads! Register now!
Avatar
Doomsday192
371 Posts
Posted Jun 08, 2008
Replied 36 minutes later
oh good god...
the person just noclipped out of the map, put a portal by the WCC/Cake, then went back to the area and turned noclip off, then just went thru the portal again and said he "found" the cake and WCC.
Avatar
Test Subject
162 Posts
Posted Jun 08, 2008
Replied 1 hour later

Doomsday192 wrote:
oh good god...
the person just noclipped out of the map, put a portal by the WCC/Cake, then went back to the area and turned noclip off, then just went thru the portal again and said he "found" the cake and WCC.

Yeah, thats what I thought. It's a neat idea though. I did the same thing I my PC and created a savegame there so I can return anytime I want. Also if you noclip out and steal the WCC and put it outside or something before you kill GLaDOS the WCC is wherever you leave it.

Avatar
Ricotez
738 Posts
Posted Jun 09, 2008
Replied 14 hours later
Dude, you do realise your sig is forbidden by test protocols set up by Msleeper, right? Keeping it will result in an unsatisfactory mark on your testing record, followed by a yellow card.
Avatar
Hober
1,180 Posts
Posted Jun 09, 2008
Replied 1 hour later

Ricotez wrote:
Dude, you do realise your sig is forbidden by test protocols set up by Msleeper, right? Keeping it will result in an unsatisfactory mark on your testing record, followed by a yellow card.

Wait, what?

The Forum Rules wrote:
Acceptable signature sizes are 400x100 and no bigger than say 100k, and/or 100 pixels worth of text (usually 2 or 3 lines). Your signature will be removed if you violate this rule!

Oh, hey, lookee there. Good call, Ricotez. I knew it was unsightly, but not actually against the rules.

P.S. I know which browser I'm using and which ISP I'm using. Mostly because I installed the browser and I send the ISP money every month.

Carry on.

Avatar
rellikpd
1,053 Posts
Posted Jun 09, 2008
Replied 8 minutes later

Hober wrote:
Oh, hey, lookee there. Good call, Ricotez. I knew it was unsightly, but not actually against the rules.

P.S. I know which browser I'm using and which ISP I'm using. Mostly because I installed the browser and I send the ISP money every month.

Carry on.

msleeper wrote:
[LINK TO]
Part of me wants to say "Fuck you Danasoft for being able to afford advertising, MyPHPsig does everything your gay ass bullshit signatures do but we do it better by allowing people to add more shits and put up images and other random wastes of time while allowing people to see exactly how much of their lives they have pissed away on internet forums," but it would be much easier to just alter your signature and/or ban you.

Avatar
Ricotez
738 Posts
Posted Jun 09, 2008
Replied 1 hour later
There you have it.

IN YOUR FACE! MUAHAHAHA!

So, Test Subject, get rid of that signature before Msleeper sees it and his vision goes all blurry and red and first returns to normal once he's banned you.

Avatar
rellikpd
1,053 Posts
Posted Jun 09, 2008
Replied 3 hours later
um if you investigate further you will see that this person you are telling this too is the same one that msleeper was speaking to directly (in my link'd post)

from what i gather sleeper doesn't have anything against danasoft as far as the forum rules are concerned he just hates them on a personal level.

EDIT: But i digress this has already been covered, and even in this forum its been covered, this is fake, and stupid. the word "real" and "legit" should be used accordingly. and if someone throws around said words wrongly they should receive a LifeBan from [Religious Deity Name Here]

Locking

Avatar
Duffers
474 Posts
Posted Jun 09, 2008
Replied 16 minutes later

rellikpd wrote:
from what i gather sleeper doesn't have anything against danasoft as far as the forum rules are concerned he just hates them on a personal level.

If you know Msleeper, you know that his personal feelings toward something ARE the rules. If they're not, TOO BAD! (see; Portalboat.)

ALSO; gonna have to start handing out the fluffy yellow cards if people keep saying locked like it's their choice.

Avatar
MrTwoVideoCards
584 Posts
Posted Jun 09, 2008
Replied 57 minutes later
How about we get this Thread back on track.
Avatar
Ricotez
738 Posts
Posted Jun 09, 2008
Replied 9 minutes later
That's a good idea. I've already got a spam warning on another forum today, don't want that to happen here as well.

So, about that vid... I think it's fake.

Avatar
rellikpd
1,053 Posts
Posted Jun 09, 2008
Replied 2 hours later
i say locked as a joke. cuz there is no way for this topic to get back "on topic"

topic? Is this crap real.
Answer? No. and its been covered before.

the thing that upsets me most is that which ever asshole made that video knew it wasn't real. so why post it saying it is. llame.

does the Pop-and-lock dance

Avatar
Duffers
474 Posts
Posted Jun 09, 2008
Replied 2 minutes later

rellikpd wrote:
i say locked as a joke.

Well some jokes aren't funny.

Off-topic'd.

Avatar
rellikpd
1,053 Posts
Posted Jun 09, 2008
Replied 1 minutes later
now that this is off topic'd:
humor is relative. and i think it was funny.

but you responded before i could edit my previous post

but anyway i appoligize for trying to be funny. I promise it won't happen again.

Advertisement
Registered users don't see ads! Register now!
Avatar
msleeper
4,095 Posts
Member
Posted Jun 09, 2008
Replied 2 hours later

easter-egg-debunked-spoilers-t154.html