Regarding all Comcast Customers

Avatar
PortalFan77
432 Posts
Posted Sep 18, 2008

Quote:
Comcast has confirmed that all residential customers will be subject to a 250 gigabyte per month data limit starting October 1
PC MAG Article

"This is the same system we have in place today," Comcast wrote in an amendment to its acceptable use policy. "The only difference is that we will now provide a limit by which a customer may be contacted."

The cable provider insisted that 250 GB is "an extremely large amount of data, much more than a typical residential customer uses on a monthly basis."

To run afoul of these limits, Comcast said, customers would have to do one of the following: send 50 million e-mails; download 62,500 songs; download 125 standard-definition movies; or upload 25,000 high-resolution digital photos.

Comcast came under fire last year for cutting off service to customers who consumed a large amount of bandwidth but refusing to provide those customers with information on how much bandwidth they were able to use.

"As part of our pre-existing policy, we will continue to contact the top users of our high-speed Internet service and ask them to curb their usage," Comcast said Thursday.

"If a customer uses more than 250 GB and is one of the top users of our service, he or she may be contacted by Comcast to notify them of excessive use," according to the AUP. "At that time, we'll tell them exactly how much data per month they had used. We know from experience the vast majority of customers we ask to curb usage do so voluntarily."

Late last year, the Associated Press and the Electronic Frontier Foundation accused Comcast of blocking access to certain file-sharing Web sites, a complaint that eventually led the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to approve an enforcement action against Comcast that requires it to be more transparent about its network management policy by year's end.

Comcast admitted to delaying P2P traffic during peak times but denied ever blocking access to any site. Prior to the FCC enforcement action, Comcast reached agreements with BitTorrent, Pando Networks, and Vonage under which the cable company would develop a protocol agnostic network management policy by year's end and come up with a P2P bill of rights.

The company confirmed in May that it was considering a 250 GB bandwidth cap, and started testing that system in several markets. Earlier this month, a spokesman said that those tests suggested that bandwidth hogs might encounter delays of up to 20 minutes during peak traffic times.

To publicize the change, Comcast will run banner notices on its Comcast.net home page and security channel Web site, update the FAQ in its help section, and include an insert in an upcoming billing statement.

Washington-based interest group Free Press, which filed the complaint against Comcast with the FCC, said it remained concerned about how a cap helps solve Comcast's congestion problems or how it will work with other usage limits under consideration the company is considering.

"Though the proposed cap is relatively high, it will increasingly ensnare more users as technology continues its natural progression," S. Derek Turner, research director of Free Press, said in a statement. "If Comcast has oversold their network to the point of creating congestion problems, then well-disclosed caps for Internet use are a better short-term solution than Comcast's current practice of illegally blocking Internet traffic."

Turner said the move highlights why the U.S. needs more "genuine broadband competition."

250 Gb is such a Huge limit though, you say,
Just hooked up one of my PCs with a Bandwidth Meter Program,
ShaPlus Bandwidth Meter

My PC, we have 5 Total- not including Wii, PS2, PSP, Location Free tv, Internet Cell Phones, ETC,

In one week it is at 83 GB ,
with a Download Tom. of 16+Gb for the New Crysis Warhead direct download to the PC from the Company,

Technology ++++
No trip to the Store Needed.

Like paying higher prices for limited Bandwidth and Slower Connection,

Drop Comcast, It will be a Better world without there crappy cable line thats always Fuzzy anyway!

The Verizon Fiber-optic FiOs System will be here shortly, its a wire that is made for the Future.

Comcast --- Competition

  1. Verizon 's Fiber-optic FiOs -The Killer to the Comcast Connection

-Cheaper, Faster
-Verizon FiOS Internet Service is the fastest and most powerful connection we've ever offered. With FiOS, you have the choice of several packages to meet your needs. We offer downstream connection speeds (the speed that data is transmitted to your computer) ranging from up to 10 Mbps all the way up to 50 Mbps. We offer upstream speeds up to 20 Mbps in some locations.Comcast to Cap Data Transfers at 250 GB in Oct.

The Verizon Fiber-optic FiOs System will be here shortly, its a wire that is made for the Future.
Verizon Internet

  1. AT@T
    AT@T internet link--as low as $19 a month
    . AT&T Ultra Speed -60 Bucks -Internet even when Cable is Out!- Storm Coming

  2. Time Warner

If U have a internet Connection other than Comcast please post- Plan and rates!

Fire Comcast Today!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Guess we comcast customers are screwed. I expect them to start limiting more after this.

Advertisement
Registered users don't see ads! Register now!
Avatar
Remmiz
631 Posts
Posted Sep 18, 2008
Replied 51 minutes later
250GB should be plenty. Between myself and my flatmate (we both torrent like freaks and game a lot) so far this month:

September 2008 (Incoming: 26961 MB / Outgoing: 5700 MB)

While I don't think there should be any caps at all, 250GB should be plenty unless you are running a web server or something.

Avatar
taco
504 Posts
Posted Sep 18, 2008
Replied 42 minutes later
You think 250 is bad? Try moving to "Canada: land of the screwed".

Your speed and cap is based on you plan, and most caps are in the 60-100 gig range, with the most basic packages in the 2-25 gig range.

Avatar
bizob
186 Posts
Posted Sep 18, 2008
Replied 7 minutes later
Wow if I were a Comcast customer I'd be switching to FIOS in a heartbeat. AFAIK they have no limits and offer faster connections at better prices.
Avatar
PortalFan77
432 Posts
Posted Sep 18, 2008
Replied 22 minutes later

bizob wrote:
Wow if I were a Comcast customer I'd be switching to FIOS in a heartbeat. AFAIK they have no limits and offer faster connections at better prices.

Yep I plan on it very soon, I went with comcast cause they said no limits.

Avatar
reepblue
894 Posts
Posted Sep 19, 2008
Replied 7 hours later
You told me about this. . .

Yeah I had a limit with satilite. With limits, Online gaming is horrible and they shut you off if they go over it. Any company who makes a fast internet service for very cheap (not including Verizon or any other 1 billion dollar corp.) will end up like this. Switch to another service. . .

Avatar
Remmiz
631 Posts
Posted Sep 19, 2008
Replied 3 hours later

reepblue wrote:
satilite. is horrible

Also, FiOS is great but only available in very few areas. We need more fiber!

Avatar
PortalFan77
432 Posts
Posted Sep 19, 2008
Replied 1 hour later

Remmiz wrote:
Also, FiOS is great but only available in very few areas. We need more fiber!

Its available here I think Ill get it when my plan expires.

Avatar
WackoMcGoose
71 Posts
Posted Sep 19, 2008
Replied 2 hours later
Yeah, I heard about that too. But in another magazine (I think it was "Time" Magazine...), they said that Comcast placing a cap on bandwidth usage was unconstitutional. So (at least for awhile), we don't have to worry about getting hosed by our ISP just for using too much bandwidth. Take that, Comcast!
Avatar
bizob
186 Posts
Posted Sep 19, 2008
Replied 1 hour later

Remmiz wrote:
We need more fiber!

These silly bandwidth limits remind me of the old dialup accounts (when that was all you could get) that charged by the minute.

Avatar
Hober
1,180 Posts
Posted Sep 20, 2008
Replied 1 day later

WackoMcGoose wrote:
But in another magazine (I think it was "Time" Magazine...), they said that Comcast placing a cap on bandwidth usage was unconstitutional.

If the Constitution really stipulates regulations on how private businesses can handle their affairs and price their wares, I'm a monkey's uncle.

The Tenth Amendment wrote:
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

Avatar
WackoMcGoose
71 Posts
Posted Oct 02, 2008
Replied 12 days later

Hober wrote:
If the Constitution really stipulates regulations on how private businesses can handle their affairs and price their wares, I'm a monkey's uncle.

Actually, I think it violated freedom of speech by limiting customers' access to information.

Avatar
Hober
1,180 Posts
Posted Oct 02, 2008
Replied 14 minutes later

WackoMcGoose wrote:
Actually, I think it violated freedom of speech by limiting customers' access to information.

Let me put this another way: if capping bandwidth is unconstitutional, the logical reverse is that unlimited broadband access is a Constitutional right.

Whaaa?

Avatar
msleeper
4,095 Posts
Member
Posted Oct 02, 2008
Replied 15 minutes later
Avatar
WackoMcGoose
71 Posts
Posted Oct 02, 2008
Replied 39 minutes later

msleeper wrote:
Hober wrote:

Let me put this another way: if capping bandwidth is unconstitutional, the logical reverse is that unlimited broadband access is a Constitutional right.

Whaaa?

Yeeeeeeeeeeeah... But the internet didn't exist when the Constitution was written. In fact, the idea of an internet hadn't been thought of yet

Avatar
msleeper
4,095 Posts
Member
Posted Oct 02, 2008
Replied 42 minutes later
That's not really the way that it works.
Avatar
Hober
1,180 Posts
Posted Oct 03, 2008
Replied 1 hour later

msleeper wrote:
That's not really the way that it works.

Man, they didn't have intertubes when the 4th was written, so the FBI can read all our email because it doesn't mention SMTP in the Bill of Rights.

Avatar
msleeper
4,095 Posts
Member
Posted Oct 03, 2008
Replied 14 hours later
brb need to go delete some incriminating evidence then.
Avatar
bizob
186 Posts
Posted Oct 03, 2008
Replied 2 hours later

msleeper wrote:
brb need to go delete some incriminating evidence then.

Too late, Al Gore already has it.

Interesting side note: Al Gore didn't actually claim to invent the internet, he was however a major supporter for the Congressional funding of Apranet.

Advertisement
Registered users don't see ads! Register now!
Avatar
Hober
1,180 Posts
Posted Oct 03, 2008
Replied 19 minutes later

bizob wrote:
Interesting side note: Al Gore didn't actually claim to invent the internet, he was however a major supporter for the Congressional funding of ARPANet

Fixed.

Also, welcome to (at the latest) 2005.